全年生产数据与图表看板

Both cover 48 weeks with consistent assignments, retain the Week 1 inputs, and contain week-selection validation and four chart objects. A's rendered data sheet shows correct averages, totals and green/red performer highlighting—for example, Operator 1 has 944 average and 4,720 total. Its KPI formulas produce 38,880 units, Machine 3 leading with 13,300, and correct shift contributions. B has correct cached results, but its rendered Average Output and Total Output columns repeatedly show Err:507. A is therefore more reliably demonstrated. B's rendering errors do not, by themselves, establish that its structured-reference formulas fail in Excel.

B has stronger evidence of being usable: its rendered Week 1 calculations are correct—for example, Operator 1 averages 944 units and totals 4,720—and top/bottom conditional formatting visibly works. A’s corresponding columns render as Err:507 throughout, despite correct cached values. Both contain 48 weeks of consistent assignments, week-range selectors, four chart objects and correct Week 1 summary calculations. Full compliance cannot be confirmed from the available dashboard evidence.

Both workbooks have the right overall shape: two sheets with the required names, 432 rows covering 48 weeks × 9 operators with fixed machine and shift assignments, and Week 1 values matching the input. Both Dashboards also have 4 charts, start/end week drop-downs and four PivotTables whose cached values match (38,880 total; Machine 3 = 13,300; Day/Night average 908.6/808.25; leaderboard led by Operator 1 at 4,720). The difference is whether the calculations actually work. **Submission A** - Average and Total use plain cell-reference formulas such as =IF(COUNT(E5:I5)=0,"",SUM(E5:I5)). - The rendered data sheet shows correct values (944.0 / 4,720 … 760.0 / 3,800). - Conditional formatting visibly works: green marks the top performer and red the bottom. - The KPI table covers every required item with correct figures: total 38,880; Operator 1 at 4,720; Machine 3 at 13,300; 4,320 per operator; Day 58.4% and Night 41.6% (22,715 / 16,165). - PivotTables (a)–(d) and the week drop-downs are present. **Submission B** - Average Output, Total Output and Days Entered use unqualified structured references, `[@[Monday Output]:[Friday Output]]`. The file check flags these as anomalous formulas. - In the rendered pages, every Average and Total cell shows Err:507, including all Week 1 rows. No top/bottom highlighting appears. - The dashboard's SUMIFS/AVERAGEIFS KPIs and chart feeds read these columns through the WeeklyTotals, WeeklyAverages and DaysEntered names. The failure therefore likely cascades into the dashboard, which only shows stale cached values. - B's extra sophistication (named ranges, endpoint normalization, a YTD KPI) does not offset the broken core calculations.

Both workbooks have the same overall structure. Each has a 48-week by 9-operator data table with fixed machine and shift assignments, Week 1 values taken from the input, Start/End Week dropdowns on the Dashboard, pivot-style sections (a)–(d) with correct Week 1 values (38,880 total; Machine 3 = 13,300; Day 908.6 / Night 808.25; leaderboard led by Operator 1), four charts and a KPI block. The difference is reliability. Submission A writes its required Average Output and Total Output formulas as shorthand table references (`[@[Monday Output]:[Friday Output]]`). In the rendered pages, every row of both columns shows `Err:507`, including all nine Week 1 rows. Because the errors replace the values, A's top/bottom conditional formatting is not visible either. A's Dashboard KPIs, helper ranges and charts are built on these columns (the WeeklyTotals and WeeklyAverages ranges), so they would fail wherever the formulas are recalculated. The cached values are correct, and Excel might accept the syntax, but the visible output shows the core auto-calculation broken. A's extra sophistication (blank vs. zero handling, reversed-endpoint normalisation, share percentages) does not offset this. Submission B uses plain formulas (`=IF(COUNT(E5:I5)=0,"",AVERAGE(E5:I5))` and the SUM equivalent) that render correctly (944.0 / 4,720 for Operator 1). Its conditional formatting visibly works: green marks the top performer (Operator 1) and red the bottom (Operator 4). B's KPI table labels items (a)–(e) exactly as the task asks, and the values check out: 38,880 total units; Operator 1 with 4,720; Machine 3 with 13,300; 4,320 average per operator; 58.4% day and 41.6% night. It also includes consistency checks, data validation on the data entry columns, and pivots (a)–(d) with a sorted YTD leaderboard. B is the complete, working deliverable.