按集体合同生成薪酬工作簿
两位裁判有分歧
按原题要求比较实际成果
GLM 5.3 第 1 代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗GPT 6.1 初代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗裁判为什么这样判断
两位裁判各看两次,第二次交换 A、B 的位置。下面保留原文,并标明每次的 A、B 对应哪份成果。
GPT 6.1 的两次判断
第 1 次 · GPT 6.1 初代 更好
A:GPT 6.1 初代
B:GLM 5.3 第 1 代
原题要求 · A:材料不足,无法判断;B:未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A is substantially closer: effective-dated rates and percentages feed per-person weekly category totals, with implemented checks for paired-rehearsal exceptions, woodwind designations and engagement-wide sound-check limits. B incorrectly excludes the French-horn premium when trumpet is present, overlooking Article 4.2.c. Its synth-substitute formula also offsets rehearsal and sound-check earnings against the show-specific entitlement, eliminating the sample’s top-up. B checks sound-check frequency only within one week and does not implement the paired-rehearsal waiver. A’s functionality remains uncertain, however: its rendered calculation and check cells repeatedly show Err:507 despite populated cached totals.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Successful recalculation of A in Excel to resolve the discrepancy between its cached results and rendered Err:507 errors.
第 2 次 · GPT 6.1 初代 更好
A:GLM 5.3 第 1 代
B:GPT 6.1 初代
原题要求 · A:未完全满足;B:材料不足,无法判断
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
B implements substantially better CBA logic: the qualifying paired-rehearsal waiver, engagement-wide sound-check frequency checks, and French horn’s 15% first-local premium even when trumpet is present. A incorrectly forbids that horn premium, always applies a three-hour minimum to each rehearsal, and lets rehearsal/sound-check earnings erase the synthesizer substitute’s show-specific adjustment. B’s effective-dated rate tables and week-filtered attendance ledger also better support changing rates and longer runs. However, B’s rendered calculation/check columns contain pervasive Err:507 values despite numeric, error-free cached results, so its live Excel usability cannot be confirmed.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Recalculated results from submission B in Excel, including its weekly payroll report, to resolve the discrepancy between cached results and rendered Err:507 errors.
Claude Opus 5.5 的两次判断
第 1 次 · GPT 6.1 初代 更好
A:GPT 6.1 初代
B:GLM 5.3 第 1 代
原题要求 · A:满足;B:未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A applies the CBA more accurately and completely, although it is harder to use and its render shows errors. B is simpler and renders cleanly, but it misapplies several terms, so its pay figures and conflict flags are wrong in common cases.
A's strengths:
- Rates are effective-dated and include every base rate and percentage, with overlap and coverage checks.
- First-local premiums use family, rank and seat. Twenty percent applies only to concertmaster, first trumpet, or first horn when no trumpet is called for.
- The first-local French horn correctly gets 15% under 4.2.c even though a trumpet is present.
- Woodwind premiums follow employer designation, and the quartet premium requires confirmation.
- The synth-sub cap offers two selectable readings, and audits are tracked at two per book across the engagement.
- The weekly guarantee top-up offsets only performance base, with premiums and doubling on top.
- Rehearsal checks cover 9am and 10am starts, the 3-hour minimum with the 7.4 lunch-pair waiver, 50/10 breaks and 5-hour meals. Sound checks are checked against their anchor call and engagement-length frequency.
- Weekly Payroll gives each person Performance, Guarantee, Synth uplift, Rehearsal, Sound check, Audit, Premiums, Doubling, Vacation and Gross. The START review queue summarises flags.
- The cached sample total of $30,825.40 reconciles with its documented methods.
A's weaknesses:
- It is heavy for a contractor: an ID-based attendance ledger plus approval toggles.
- Every [@...] structured-reference column shows Err:507 in the render (Checks columns, Level, attendance lookups), so conflict messages do not display there.
- It applies the electronic premium to audit pay, which is debatable.
B's strengths:
- Plain formulas and named ranges.
- A clear P/A attendance grid and a CBA Checks sheet marking OK, REVIEW or VIOLATION.
- Per-person category totals.
- The render works, and the 9:30am rehearsal is visibly flagged.
B's errors:
- **French horn:** any horn premium is flagged as a VIOLATION whenever a trumpet is present, and the sample horn gets 0%. This contradicts 4.2.c.
- **Woodwinds:** the "more than one premium player" check would wrongly flag employer-designated multiple woodwind premiums.
- **Twenty percent:** nothing restricts the 20% rate to trumpet, violin or horn.
- **Guarantee:** the top-up is measured against a subtotal that includes rehearsals, premiums and doubling, so premiums are absorbed in short weeks.
- **Synth sub:** the 150% minimum is netted against rehearsal and sound-check pay, so the sample sub gets no uplift.
- **Invented rule:** rehearsals without intermissions, or ending after 6:30pm, are repriced at the per-service rate.
- **Missing rules:** there is no 7.4 waiver, and sound-check frequency is checked only within one week.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Rendered pages for A's Weekly Detail and Weekly Payroll sheets (only pages 1-8 of 23 shown)
- Rendered pages for B's Payroll and CBA Checks sheets (pages 9-11 not shown)
- Whether A's unqualified [@[...]] structured-reference formulas parse correctly in desktop Excel (LibreOffice render shows Err:507)
第 2 次 · GLM 5.3 第 1 代 更好
A:GLM 5.3 第 1 代
B:GPT 6.1 初代
原题要求 · A:满足;B:材料不足,无法判断
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A is the more reliably usable deliverable, although B has the stronger contract logic. B's advantage only counts if its formulas work, and the rendered evidence leaves that in doubt.
**Submission A works as rendered.**
- Its formulas recalculate in the rendered pages: the Roster shows doubling/premium/add-on % (e.g., Woodwind 45%+15%), and the Schedule shows $278.35 rehearsal, $76.59 sound check and $251.06 performances.
- The 9:30am rehearsal row is highlighted pink with an Art. 7.3 exigent-circumstances flag.
- The Payroll sheet gives each musician performance, rehearsal, sound check, audit, premiums, doubling, sub minimum, guarantee top-up, 5.5% vacation and total.
- A CBA Checks sheet rolls up 22 rules as OK/REVIEW/VIOLATION.
- Rates sit in a year-keyed table with editable percentage parameters.
- The P/A attendance grid is quick for a contractor's weekly entry.
**Submission A has real logic errors.**
- It treats the horn premium as not payable when a trumpet is in the show. That contradicts Art. 4.2.c, which grants French horn 15% regardless of seating, so the sample horn is underpaid and a correct entry would be flagged as a violation.
- Nothing stops a 20% first-chair designation on instruments other than trumpet, violin or horn.
- The synth-sub minimum is netted against rehearsal and sound-check pay.
**Submission B is deeper and more accurate on paper.**
- It pays French horn 15% even with a trumpet, validates seats (concertmaster, first trumpet, first horn) and applies the Art. 7.4 lunch-pair waiver.
- It checks meal-break placement and links each sound check to its anchor call, with frequency checked across the whole engagement.
- Rates are effective-dated and include the percentages; audits are tracked by book; the synth-cap readings are documented, along with a verbatim copy of the CBA.
- Cached values compute a weekly gross of $30,825.40.
**Submission B's rendered pages show widespread failures.**
- Err:507 appears in every Checks column, Premium Chairs Level, and Attendance Date/Type/Musician.
- Its formulas store raw `[@[...]]` structured references, which the renderer could not parse and which may not open cleanly in Excel.
- It is also heavy to operate: a separate premium-chairs table, service IDs, sound-check anchors, an 8,000-row one-row-per-musician-per-service ledger, and approval gating that leaves the sample "NOT READY".
On balance, A's functioning, practical model outweighs B's richer but less verifiable and more burdensome design.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Rendered pages 9-11 of A (Payroll and CBA Checks sheets) were not shown
- Rendered Weekly Detail / Weekly Payroll / CBA & Methods pages of B were not shown
- Whether B's raw [@[...]] structured-reference formulas open and recalculate without repair in desktop Excel
每位裁判先合并交换位置前后的判断;两位裁判方向一致时给出胜负或持平,否则保留分歧。