全年生产数据与图表看板
Kimi K3 初代 更好
按原题要求比较实际成果
Kimi K3 第 1 代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗Kimi K3 初代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗裁判为什么这样判断
两位裁判各看两次，第二次交换 A、B 的位置。下面保留原文，并标明每次的 A、B 对应哪份成果。
GPT 6.1 的两次判断
第 1 次 · Kimi K3 初代 更好
A：Kimi K3 初代
B：Kimi K3 第 1 代
原题要求 · A：未完全满足；B：未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料：A：1 份文件、8 张页面图；B：0 份文件、0 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A provides both required worksheets, correct Week 1 inputs, consistent assignments across 48 weeks, automatic average/total formulas, week-selection validation lists, and four chart objects. However, it fills Weeks 2–48 with unsupported production values and counts them as actual YTD output: the leaderboard totals 1,890,588 units, whereas the supplied Week 1 data supports an initial YTD total of 38,880. B submitted no deliverable, so A is better despite this significant correctness issue.
裁判指出未能看到的材料：
- Dashboard rendered pages and object definitions needed to verify chart types and quadrant arrangement, structured tables, conditional formatting, and native PivotTables were not supplied.
第 2 次 · Kimi K3 初代 更好
A：Kimi K3 第 1 代
B：Kimi K3 初代
原题要求 · A：未完全满足；B：未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料：A：0 份文件、0 张页面图；B：1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A submitted no deliverable. B provides both required worksheets, correct Week 1 inputs, 48 weeks of consistent operator assignments, automatic averages and totals, week-range dropdowns, KPI formulas, and four embedded charts. However, B populates Weeks 2–48 with unsupported production figures and includes them in its YTD leaderboard, totaling 1,890,588 units rather than the 38,880 supported by the supplied Week 1 data. B is substantially closer to the task, but its YTD reporting is not correct for the provided inputs.
裁判指出未能看到的材料：
- Dashboard rendered pages and chart source, type, and quadrant-layout details.
- Conditional-formatting rules and actual PivotTable object definitions.
Claude Opus 5.5 的两次判断
第 1 次 · Kimi K3 初代 更好
A：Kimi K3 初代
B：Kimi K3 第 1 代
原题要求 · A：满足；B：未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料：A：1 份文件、8 张页面图；B：0 份文件、0 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
Submission B submitted no files, so it cannot meet any requirement. Submission A delivered a workbook with both required sheets. 'Operator Output Data' has 432 data rows (Week 1–Week 48 × Operators 1–9). Its columns are Week #, Operator, Machine Line, Shift, Monday–Friday Output, Average Output (=AVERAGE(E:I)) and Total Output (=SUM(E:I)). The Week 1 values match the input exactly (e.g., Op1 950/930/940/945/955; Op9 910/900/905/915/920). Machine and shift assignments stay the same for all 48 weeks. The 'Dashboard' sheet has list data validation on B4 and D4 (Week 1–48, From/To), defaulting to Week 1. Helper SUMPRODUCT formulas give operator, machine and shift totals and shift averages for the selected range, plus SUMIFS YTD totals per operator. There are 4 charts and a KPI table covering total units, top operator and machine with outputs, average per operator (/9), and day and night % of total. There are also four pivot-style tables with a Week # filter: operator sum, machine sum, Day/Night average, and a descending YTD leaderboard. The formulas would correctly yield the Week 1 KPIs: 38,880 total; Operator 1 at 4,720; Machine 3 at 13,300; 4,320 average; about 58.4% day and 41.6% night. There are some weaknesses. The pivots are set to '(All)' rather than the selected week, and the validation dropdowns do not drive them. Weeks 2–48 are filled with simulated data. Even so, A substantively addresses nearly every component, while B provides nothing.
裁判指出未能看到的材料：
- Rendered Dashboard sheet (chart types bar/pie/pie/bar and quadrant arrangement not visually confirmed)
- Conditional formatting rules on Average/Total Output columns are not reported in the file checks
- Workbook filename ('Dashboard Output') not shown
- Confirmation that the pivot-style tables are true PivotTable objects with pivot caches
- Cached computed values for the KPI/helper formulas
- Rendered columns G–K and rows beyond Week 43 of the data sheet
第 2 次 · Kimi K3 初代 更好
A：Kimi K3 第 1 代
B：Kimi K3 初代
原题要求 · A：未完全满足；B：满足
本次提供的成果材料：A：0 份文件、0 张页面图；B：1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
Submission A has no deliverable, so it provides nothing usable. Submission B provides a workbook with the two required sheets, and the visible evidence covers almost every requirement. 'Operator Output Data' has 432 rows (Weeks 1–48 × Operators 1–9) with the required columns: Week #, Operator, Machine Line, Shift, Monday–Friday Output, Average Output and Total Output. Week 1 matches the input file exactly (e.g., Operator 1: 950/930/940/945/955). Machine and shift assignments stay the same across all 48 weeks and match the input (Op1 M1/Day, Op2 M2/Night, etc.). Average and Total are formulas (=AVERAGE(E2:I2), =SUM(E2:I2)) filled through row 433. The 'Dashboard' sheet has From Week and To Week list validations (B4, D4) pointing to Week 1–48, both defaulting to Week 1. Its KPI table covers all five required items and is formula-driven: total units, top operator with output, top machine with output, average per operator, and day and night shift percentages. There are 4 charts, backed by helper ranges for operator totals, machine totals, shift averages and YTD per-operator totals. Below them are four pivot-style tables: operator, machine, shift average, and a leaderboard sorted by descending YTD total, each showing a 'Week #' filter. Their totals agree with each other (1,890,588 in both the operator and machine tables). Weaknesses: the pivots default to '(All)' rather than Week 1 and are not linked to the dropdowns. Conditional formatting and chart types/layout could not be confirmed. Even so, B is substantively complete, and A is empty.
裁判指出未能看到的材料：
- Conditional formatting on the Average/Total Output columns is not reported by the file check, and those columns are not visible in the rendered pages
- No rendered image of the Dashboard sheet, so chart types (bar vs. pie) and quadrant arrangement cannot be visually confirmed
- Cached values for the KPI formula cells are not shown
- Workbook file name ('Dashboard Output') is not shown
- Whether the pivot-style tables are true PivotTable objects with caches cannot be fully confirmed
每位裁判先合并交换位置前后的判断；两位裁判方向一致时给出胜负或持平，否则保留分歧。