按集体合同生成薪酬工作簿
Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代 更好
按原题要求比较实际成果
Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗Claude Opus 5.5 初代
打开成果与下载文件 ↗裁判为什么这样判断
两位裁判各看两次,第二次交换 A、B 的位置。下面保留原文,并标明每次的 A、B 对应哪份成果。
GPT 6.1 的两次判断
第 1 次 · Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代 更好
A:Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代
B:Claude Opus 5.5 初代
原题要求 · A:未完全满足;B:未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:0 份文件、0 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A provides a formula-driven Excel workbook with linked schedule and attendance inputs, editable rates, separate per-person payroll-category totals, and CBA checks—including the sample’s unexcused 9:30 a.m. rehearsal. B submitted no deliverable. A nevertheless falls short of full correctness and robustness: its calculation ranges are fixed at 30 musicians and 24 weekly services, and it forces all electronic-instrument substitutes into the special Synth Sub pay rule, although the CBA limits that provision to synthesizer substitutes.
第 2 次 · Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代 更好
A:Claude Opus 5.5 初代
B:Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代
原题要求 · A:未完全满足;B:未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:0 份文件、0 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
A submitted no deliverable. B provides a formula-driven Excel payroll workbook using the supplied CBA rates, with attendance entry, separate per-person payroll categories, and compliance checks—including flagging the sample 9:30 a.m. rehearsal without confirmed exigent circumstances. However, B does not fully meet the robustness and correctness requirements: its calculation ranges are fixed at 30 musicians and 24 weekly services; it continues using week-start rates when a rate period ends midweek; and its roster checks force all electronic-instrument substitutes into the special Synth Sub rule, although Article 4.2.f.ii specifically addresses synthesizer substitutions. B is substantially more useful than A, but still needs correction before dependable general use.
Claude Opus 5.5 的两次判断
第 1 次 · Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代 更好
A:Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代
B:Claude Opus 5.5 初代
原题要求 · A:满足;B:未完全满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:1 份文件、8 张页面图;B:0 份文件、0 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
Submission B delivered no file, so it fails the task outright.
Submission A is a complete, formula-driven Excel workbook built for the contractor's purpose. It has seven sheets: Instructions, Rates, Instruments, Schedule, Roster, Payroll, CBA Compliance and Pay Stub. The file checks show no cached errors.
**Rate updates:** The Rates sheet stores dated rate periods (2025 row: $251.06, $2008.50, $55.67, $76.59, $137.87). It selects the right period with SUMIFS on the payroll week date. Premium, doubling and vacation percentages are named parameters, so year-to-year changes are easy.
**Any orchestra or run:** It handles 30 musicians and 24 services per week. The Instruments list is extendable and maps each instrument to a premium group.
**Conflict highlighting:** The Schedule checks Art. 7.1–7.5 and 7.10 rules: 9am and 10am start limits, the 6:30pm end, the 5-hour meal break, the 3-hour minimum call with the 7.4 waiver, and sound check length, window and frequency. The sample's 9:30am rehearsal is correctly shown in red as a 7.3 conflict. The Roster checks duplicate or missing first-local designations, synth-sub status mismatches and audit allowance under 4.5.b. A summary compliance sheet totals all of these.
**Per-person category totals:** The Payroll sheet breaks out performance, rehearsal, sound check, audit, premium, doubling, gross, vacation (5.5%) and total for each musician, with a reconciliation check.
**Sample calculations check out:**
- 5-hour rehearsal = $278.35.
- 1-hour sound check = $76.59.
- 8 shows = weekly guarantee.
- Synth sub gets MIN(150% × base, guarantee) plus 25%, and 2 audits at base.
- Violin concertmaster and lead trumpet get 20%; viola, cello, bass, designated guitar, woodwind and horn get 15%.
- No quartet premium, since only 3 strings are on the roster.
- Woodwind with 4 instruments gets 25% + 10% + 10% doubling.
Ambiguous points are documented and can be toggled on the Rates sheet. The only flaw seen is cosmetic: Roster time headers display as 9:29 and 7:59.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Rendered pages and computed values for the Payroll, CBA Compliance and Pay Stub sheets were truncated, so final per-person dollar totals could not be visually confirmed.
- Conditional-formatting rules were not listed explicitly; red highlighting is confirmed only on the rendered Schedule page.
第 2 次 · Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代 更好
A:Claude Opus 5.5 初代
B:Claude Opus 5.5 第 1 代
原题要求 · A:未完全满足;B:满足
本次提供的成果材料:A:0 份文件、0 张页面图;B:1 份文件、8 张页面图。文档文字与文件检查另行提供。
Submission A provided no files, so it cannot meet any part of the task. Submission B provides a working Excel workbook that covers the brief.
- **Rate updates:** A dated Rates table (rows 5-14) is looked up by the payroll week date. Premium, doubling, vacation and work-rule parameters sit in separate named cells, so yearly changes need no formula edits.
- **Any orchestra or run:** It allows up to 30 musicians and 24 services, and the Instruments list can be extended with premium groups. Status is Regular, Substitute or Synth Sub, with chair designations and a count of instruments played for doubles.
- **Conflict highlighting:** The Schedule flags each service against Art. 7.1-7.5 and 7.10. The rendered page shows the sample 9:30 a.m. rehearsal correctly flagged red as an Art. 7.3 conflict. The Roster checks duplicate or missing first-local designations, synth-sub status mismatches and audit limits. A CBA Compliance summary blocks the 'ready to submit' status until conflicts are cleared.
- **Totals by person per category:** The Payroll sheet gives performance, rehearsal, sound check, audit, premium, doubling, gross, 5.5% vacation and total pay per person, plus a reconciliation check. These match the Art. 11.4 breakout.
- **Spot-checked calculations look right:**
- Rehearsal: 5 hrs × $55.67 = $278.35.
- Sound check: $76.59.
- Eight shows pay the weekly guarantee.
- The synth sub gets the lesser of 150% of base per show or the guarantee, plus 2 audits at base.
- Concertmaster and first trumpet get 20%; other first locals get 15%.
- The string-quartet premium is correctly off with only 3 regular strings.
- Woodwind doubles total 25% + 10% + 10%.
- No cached Excel errors.
- **Minor issues:**
- Some labels are truncated on Schedule.
- Times show without AM/PM.
- The Roster render shows 9:29 and 7:59 time artifacts.
- Several interpretive assumptions are made, but they are documented and toggleable.
裁判指出未能看到的材料:
- Rendered pages for the Payroll, CBA Compliance and Pay Stub sheets (text output truncated), so computed per-person totals could not be visually confirmed
- Conditional-formatting rules beyond what is visible on the Schedule and Roster renders
每位裁判先合并交换位置前后的判断;两位裁判方向一致时给出胜负或持平,否则保留分歧。